bpo-36774: Add !d to f-strings to make debugging easier.#13059
Closed
ericvsmith wants to merge 20 commits into
Closed
bpo-36774: Add !d to f-strings to make debugging easier.#13059ericvsmith wants to merge 20 commits into
ericvsmith wants to merge 20 commits into
Conversation
…ns currently work).
…, but it ended up not being needed.
tirkarthi
reviewed
May 2, 2019
tirkarthi
reviewed
May 2, 2019
Member
tirkarthi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This can have a WhatsNew entry since this is very helpful and increases the visibility of this feature for the next alpha release.
…f adding it at runtime.
…, and a test with a unicode literal.
Member
Author
|
Closed in favor of bpo-36817. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
!d will expand to the text of the expression, an equal sign, and the repr of the value of the expression.
https://bugs.python.org/issue36774