Updating status of BIP 0010#125
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
I think is probably the right thing to do. We should ping Alan. @etotheipi |
Contributor
|
Yes, that's fine. Armory no longer uses BIP0010. It served its purpose, and now we've moved onto better and bigger things. |
Member
|
you need to update the table in README.md as well |
Contributor
Author
|
Updated the REAMDE table. Thanks. |
afk11
pushed a commit
to afk11/bips
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2019
Link design section of BIP Schnorr in Specification
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Armory no longer uses BIP 0010 for multisignature transaction, and there does not seem to be any wallets that have actually implemented BIP 0010. BIP 0010 status should be marked as withdrawn, and the dead links to the implementation should be updated.